Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) versus conventional stone-pushing technique for impacted upper ureteral stones: a retrospective cohort study

柔性可导航吸力输尿管通路鞘(FANS)与传统推石术治疗嵌顿性上段输尿管结石的比较:一项回顾性队列研究

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Impacted upper ureteral stones pose a significant risk of ureteral injury and stricture formation during ureteroscopic procedures. The Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) integrates in-situ lithotripsy, continuous suction, and irrigation. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of FANS with the conventional ureteroscopic technique in the management of impacted upper ureteral stones. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 115 patients (FANS group: n = 50; Conventional group: n = 65). The FANS group underwent in-situ holmium laser lithotripsy with real-time irrigation and suction facilitated by FANS. The Conventional group underwent in-situ lithotripsy using a semi-rigid ureteroscope, with subsequent attempts to push stones into the renal pelvis before flexible ureteroscopic fragment extraction. The rates of ureteral stricture (within 3 months) and other perioperative parameters, including operative time, in-situ lithotripsy duration, and complications, were compared. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The FANS group exhibited significantly longer operative and in-situ lithotripsy times. However, the incidence of ureteral stricture and perforation was lower in the FANS group (2% vs. 7.7% and 2% vs. 6.2%, respectively). Subgroup analyses revealed that prolonged in-situ lithotripsy time was a significant risk factor for ureteral stricture in the control group but not in the FANS group. The immediate stone-free rate was comparable between groups, with a lower rate of postoperative fever in the FANS group. CONCLUSION: For impacted upper ureteral stones, FANS assisted in-situ lithotripsy significantly reduces the risk of postoperative ureteral stricture without compromising stone clearance, offering a safer alternative to the conventional stone-pushing technique.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。