Abstract
Identifying pest infestations in fresh fruits is a crucial aspect of international trade. Currently, inspections rely on visual observations and destructive sampling, which are, in most cases, quite demanding. The detection of oviposition signs or early larval development is largely not feasible. Therefore, new methods that are sensitive and non-destructive are urgently needed to detect fruit fly infestation during inspections of fresh produce before their introduction and spread into pest-free areas. Portable electronic olfactory systems, or electronic noses (e-noses), are used in various scientific fields and industries. In this study, we evaluated the potential of a portable PEN3 electronic nose to discriminate between non-infested and infested fruits for three fruit fly species: Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann), Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel), and Bactrocera zonata (Saunders) (Diptera: Tephritidae). E-nose datasets were generated from samples of each combination of fruit, fruit fly species, infestation status, and storage condition. These datasets were used to develop classification models. The classification accuracy of the models ranged from 50 to 99% during calibration and cross-validation conditions. However, their performance decreased substantially when applied to independent datasets, highlighting limitations in robustness. These findings indicate that although the PEN3 system shows promise as a non-destructive detection tool, its performance is strongly influenced by seasonal and experimental variability. Further work is needed to incorporate multi-season and multi-variety datasets, improve calibration, and robust validation before practical implementation in field inspection systems.