Custom vs Stock Healing Abutments on Peri-Implant Tissue Integrity in Immediate Implant: A Randomized Controlled Study

定制愈合基台与标准愈合基台对即刻种植中种植体周围组织完整性的影响:一项随机对照研究

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Maintaining soft tissue contour in immediate dental implant is a challenging task. A combination of immediate implant therapy with customized healing abutment would be effective in simulating ideal soft tissue contour. METHODOLOGY: Patients with unrestorable teeth were randomly allocated into two groups, that is, immediate implants with customized healing abutment in study group and stock healing abutment in control group. At the end of the third month, healing abutments were removed, soft tissue evaluation was done by modified plaque index (MPI), modified sulcular bleeding index (MSBI), midfacial width of keratinized tissue and functional implant prosthodontic score (FIPS), and crestal bone levels at postoperative intervals of baseline, three months, and nine months. RESULTS: The mean difference between the test group and control group in MPI was -0.14. The mean value of FIPS was slightly higher in the test group than in the control group with a mean difference of 0.71. The mean ± SD values of MSBI scores in the test group at baseline, three months, and nine months were 0.00 ± 0.00, 0.43 ± 0.535, and 0.29 ± 0.488, respectively, and in the control group were 0.00 ± 0.00, 0.57 ± 0.53, and 0.43 ± 0.53, respectively. Midfacial widths of keratinized tissue in the test group was maintained constantly at 3.8 mm from baseline, three months, and nine months. On evaluating mesial and distal crestal bone loss, the mean of -0.2 and -0.34 and P values 0.05 and 0.01 were seen. CONCLUSION: Immediate implants with a customized healing abutment group had a positive effect on maintaining peri-implant health.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。