Evaluation of the clinical effect of inflatable mediastinoscopy synchronous laparoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer: a comparative study

评估充气式纵隔镜同步腹腔镜食管癌根治术的临床疗效:一项比较研究

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the technical innovation and clinical application effect of inflatable mediastinoscopy synchronous laparoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer. METHODS: The clinical data of 180 patients with esophageal cancer treated by the same surgical team from January 2018 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the inflatable mediastinoscopy synchronous laparoscopic group (n = 93) and the McKeown group (n = 87) according to the surgical approach. Preoperative general baseline data, perioperative indices, postoperative indices, and short- and long-term survival rates were recorded and statistically analyzed for both groups. RESULTS: Compared to McKeown's procedure, the inflatable mediastinoscopy synchronized laparoscopic esophagectomy was associated with relatively less operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay, specifically (94.46 ± 20.17) minutes, (36.76 ± 16.63)ml, and (13.63 ± 2.57) days, respectively. At the same time, the postoperative complication rate of the inflatable mediastinoscopy synchronized laparoscopic esophagectomy was low compared to the postoperative complication rate of McKeown's procedure. CONCLUSION: Compared with the traditional McKeown procedure, the patients treated with inflatable mediastinoscopy synchronous laparoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer have a lower incidence of thoracic complications, shorter operation time, less pain, and faster postoperative recovery so that it can be used as a new supplementary method for mainstream McKeown radical resection of esophageal cancer.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。