Abstract
This case study aimed to compare the differences in the durability and prestress loss between normal-weight-concrete (NC) and lightweight-aggregate-concrete (LWC) prestressed box girders, which were constructed at the same time in the same area, so as to verify the superiority of using synthetic lightweight aggregate (LWA) made from reservoir sediments in prestressed bridges. For the NCs and LWCs used in the prestressed box girders, the basic mechanical properties (compressive strength, flexural strength, splitting tensile strength, and elastic modulus) were tested, as well as the durability properties (chloride ion penetration resistance and rapid chloride permeability). Then, through the prestress-monitoring system, the prestress losses of the two groups of prestressed box girders were tracked. The results of the durability test confirmed that LWC can inhibit the penetration of air, water, and chloride ions by strengthening the interfacial transition zone between the aggregate and the cement paste, thereby improving its durability. Moreover, the magnetic-flux prestress loss of the NC prestressed box girder reached 8.1%. In contrast, the magnetic-flux prestress losses on both sides of the LWC prestressed box girder were 4.6% and 4.9%, respectively. This verified that, under the same environmental conditions, the use of LWC produced less of a prestress loss than the use of NC.