2408. Is Shorter Antibiotic Treatment Feasible in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIED) Infections? Impact of Treatment Duration on 6-Month Recurrence and Mortality

2408. 缩短抗生素疗程对心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)感染患者是否可行?治疗持续时间对6个月复发率和死亡率的影响

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aim of this study is to compare the 6-month outcomes (recurrence and mortality) of patients with cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections treated with short (SHORT, <14 days) or long (LONG, >14 days) duration of antimicrobial therapy after device removal. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized at IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital (Milan, Italy) from June 2011 to June 2021, who underwent device removal for CIED infection. Patients with pocket and lead infections were included, while valve endocarditis and Staphylococcus aureus infection were excluded. The characteristics of patients in the SHORT and LONG groups were compared using the chi-square test for categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous variables. A propensity score (PS) was calculated using a logistic regression that considered duration of therapy as the dependent variable; the association between patients’ characteristics and outcomes was evaluated with logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The characteristics of the 150 included patients are described in table 1, the microbial etiology in table 2. Patients in the SHORT compared to the LONG group were older (75 [65-80] vs 69 [62-77], p-value=0.047), had a higher Charlson comorbidity index (5 [3-6] vs 4 [3-5], p-value=0.021), had less frequent isolation of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS; 46.7% vs 68.9%, p-value=0.006), and an unknown etiology (36.7% vs 13.3%, p-value=0.001). Moreover, the duration of antimicrobial treatment after device removal was shorter (13 [9-14] vs 20 [16-29] days, p-value< 0.001). At 6 months, recurrence and mortality were not significantly different between the SHORT and the LONG group (recurrences: 2 [3.7%] vs 5 [6.7%], p-value=0.464; mortality: 2 [3.7%] vs 3 [4.0%], p-value=0.931), At logistic regression analysis (table 3 and table 4) adjusted for PS, treatment duration was not significantly associated with either recurrence (odds ratio [OR] 0.524; 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.084-3.263) or mortality (OR 1.402; 95%CI 0.185-10.635). [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: A shorter duration of antimicrobial treatment after device removal may be an effective approach for treating patients with CIED infections. [Figure: see text] DISCLOSURES: Antonella Castagna, MD, Bristol-Myers Squibb: consultancy payments and speaking fees|Gilead: consultancy payments and speaking fees|Janssen-Cilag: consultancy payments and speaking fees|Merck Sharp & Dohme: consultancy payments and speaking fees|ViiV Healthcare: consultancy payments and speaking fees

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。