Abstract
PURPOSE: Although many arthrometers have been developed to assess anterior knee laxity, reliability and diagnostic accuracy of these devices are still debated. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the validity of a new arthrometer in the outpatient setting, with the hypothesis that it had good validity in terms of reliability and diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: Seventy-eight subjects (39 with ACL injury and 39 with normal ACL) were tested. ATT was assessed by means of the Lachman test at 30° of flexion with a new testing device (BLU-DAT) under three different loading conditions: 7 kg (69 N), 9 kg (88 N) and maximum (MMT). The tests were performed on both knees to obtain SSD. In the ACL injury group, the tests were performed by two examiners and one of them repeated a second test series. Inter- and intra-observer reliability were assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the average SSD measures. In the normal-ACL group, the analysis was performed with the same testing setup. Side-to-side difference measures of the two groups at every loading condition were compared by Student's t test. Data of test series were dichotomized based on the threshold value of 3-mm SSD as pathological ATT and 2 × 2 contingency tables were used to assess diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: The ICCs for intra-observer reliability at 7-kg (69 N), 9-kg (88 N) and MMT measurements were 0.781, 0.855 and 0.913, respectively. The ICC for inter-observer reliability at 7-kg (69 N), 9-kg (88 N) and MMT measurements were 0.701, 0.845 and 0.834, respectively. Comparison between the two groups showed a significant mean difference ranging from 3.4 mm for 7-kg (69 N) load to 4.6 mm for MMT. Overall accuracy ranged from 84.6% for 7-kg load to 98.7% for MMT. CONCLUSION: The BLU-DAT has proven to be an instrument with good intra- and inter-observer reliability and very good accuracy in the diagnosis of ACL injuries in the outpatient setting. So, the BLU-DAT can be a new useful tool in everyday clinical practice to assist in the diagnosis of ACL injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.