Abstract
BACKGROUND: The status of the axillary lymph node (ALN) in patients with breast cancer can critically inform clinical decision-making and prognosis. Preoperative evaluation of limited nodal burden (0-2 metastatic ALNs) and high nodal burden (≥3 metastatic ALNs) is vital for individual treatment in patients with breast cancer. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the value of Angio-PLUS (AP; Aixplorer, SuperSonic Imagine) and the qualitative and quantitative shear-wave elastography (SWE) of breast lesions to predict limited or high axillary nodal burden and to develop a model for predicting limited or high axillary nodal burden. METHODS: From March 2020 to November 2022, a total of 232 consecutive patients with breast cancer comprising 232 breast lesions were enrolled retrospectively from Yueyang Central Hospital. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of AP, qualitative SWE, quantitative SWE, and the predictive model for evaluating limited or high axillary nodal burden were compared. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in AP patterns between the limited nodal burden group and high nodal burden group. The best cutoff values of Emin (the minimal value of the first Q-box), Emean (the mean value of the first Q-box), Emax (the maximum value of the first Q-box), Eratio (ratio of the first Q-Box and the second Q-Box) and standard deviation for predicting limited or high nodal burden were 80.85 KPa, 133.45 KPa, 153.40 KPa, 9.95, and 19.25 KPa, respectively. The Emax had the highest AUC, and its sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, and AUC were 71.64%, 56.36%, 40.00%, 83.04%, 60.78%, and 0.640 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.575-0.702], respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, and AUC of seven color patterns for qualitative SWE were 71.64%, 74.55%, 53.33%, 86.62%, 73.71%, and 0.731 (95% CI: 0.669-0.787), respectively, which was significantly higher than all the other quantitative SWE parameters. ALN evaluation in ultrasound and qualitative SWE were independent risk factors for predicting limited or high nodal burden according to a binary logistics regression analysis. The AUC of the predictive model based on independent risk factors was 0.820 (95% CI: 0.765-0.867), which was significantly higher than that of the other independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: The seven color patterns in the qualitative SWE of breast lesions were valuable for predicting limited or high nodal burden for patients with breast cancer. Compared with quantitative SWE, qualitative SWE exhibited a better diagnostic performance. Breast lesions present no findings, vertical stripes, and spot patterns were important indicators for limited nodal burden. The predictive model developed in this study could be a simple, noninvasive, and convenient method for predicting limited or high nodal burden, which would be beneficial for clinical decision-making and individual treatment to improve prognosis.