Abstract
Pathologists usually explore extrathyroidal extensions (ETEs) in thyroid cancer; however, sonographers are often not concerned with ETEs. We investigated factors influencing ETEs and the efficacy of ultrasound evaluation of thyroid capsule invasion. We retrospectively analysed 1933 papillary thyroid carcinoma patients who underwent thyroidectomy during 2018-2021. Patients were divided into three groups: no ETE, minor ETE (mETE), and gross ETE. Clinical characteristic differences were assessed using binary logistic regression analysis to identify ETE predictors, and the kappa test was performed to analyse consistency between ultrasonographic and pathological diagnoses of ETE. The mETE group was more likely to have larger tumour diameters and more extensive lymph node metastasis (LNM) than the no ETE group and more likely to be diagnosed in the isthmus. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, longest tumour diameter, lesion site, LNM extent, and thyroglobulin concentration were significant mETE predictors. Minimal consistency existed between pathological and ultrasonographic examinations for neighbouring tissue invasion. Many clinical differences were observed between the no ETE and mETE groups, suggesting the importance of considering mETE. Therefore, sonographers should pay more attention to relationships between nodules and capsule and indicate these on ultrasound reports to provide more accurate preoperative ETE information for surgeons.