Abstract
Aromatic amines are a class of compounds bearing amino groups on their benzene rings; these compounds are important raw materials for the industrial production of rubber chemicals, pesticides, dyes, pharmaceuticals, photosensitive chemicals, and agricultural chemicals. Research has revealed that some aromatic amines teratogenetic, carcinogenic, and mutagenic properties. Given the high toxicity and potential harm caused by aromatic amines, monitoring their levels in water sources is critical. Aromatic amines are among the 14 strategic environmental pollutants blacklisted in China, and assessing their exposure levels is essential for protecting human health and the environment. At present, the standard method for detecting aromatic amines in water is liquid-liquid extraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (LLE-GC-MS). However, this method has the disadvantages of large sample size requirement, complex operation, long analysis time, and high reagent consumption. In this study, instead of traditional LLE technology, cloud point extraction (CPE) technology was used in combination with GC-MS to establish an efficient, sensitive, and environment-friendly method for the detection of nine aromatic amines, namely, 2-chloramine, 3-chloramine, 4-chloramine, 2-nitroaniline, 3-nitroaniline, 4-nitroaniline, 1-naphthylamine, 2-naphthylamine, and 4-aminobenzene, in water. Triton X-114 was used as the extraction agent. The main experimental parameters were optimized using a single-factor optimization method. The aromatic amines in various water samples were quantitatively analyzed using GC-MS. The nine aromatic amines were separated on a DB-35 MS capillary column (30 m×0.25 mm×0.25 μm). The mass spectrometer was operated in selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode, and quantitative analysis was performed using the internal standard method. The results demonstrated that all nine aromatic amines could be completely separated within 16 min and had good linearities within accurate mass concentration ranges, with correlation coefficients (R(2)) greater than 0.998. The limits of detection (LODs) and quantification (LOQs) of these aromatic amines in water were 0.12-0.48 and 0.40-1.60 μg/L, respectively. The accuracy and precision of the method were assessed via the determination of aromatic amines in surface water of drinking water sources, offshore seawater, wastewater of the typical printing and dyeing industry at levels of 2.0 and 10.0 μg/L. The recoveries of the aromatic amines in surface water of drinking water sources were 81.1%-109.8%, with intra-day and inter-day relative standard deviations (RSDs) of 0.7%-5.2% (n=6) and 1.6%-6.2% (n=3), respectively. The recoveries of the aromatic amines in offshore seawater were 83.0%-115.8%, with intra-day RSDs (n=6) of 1.5%-8.6% and inter-day RSDs (n=3) of 2.4%-12.2%. The recoveries of the nine aromatic amines in wastewater of the typical printing and dyeing industry were 91.0%-120.0%, with intra-day RSDs (n=6) of 2.9%-12.9% and inter-day RSDs (n=3) of 2.5%-13.1%. The established method was used to detect nine aromatic amines in actual water samples. No aromatic amines were detected in the surface water of drinking water sources or offshore seawater samples. However, 2-chloramine, 4-chloramine, and 4-aminobenzene, which are frequently used in the printing and dyeing industry, were detected in the wastewater of the typical printing and dyeing industry samples. The proposed method offers the advantages of simple operation, high sensitivity, low cost, low organic reagent requirement, and good repeatability. Thus, this method provides reliable technical support for studying the residual status and environmental behavior of aromatic amines in water.