Abstract
Background Breast reduction (BR) techniques have evolved tremendously since their introduction. However, a comparison of these techniques has yet to clarify the best choice or whether there is only one choice. This study aims to contribute to this research by retrospectively comparing the missing points of superomedial (SM) and inferior (INF) pedicle techniques. Methodology A total of 93 patients underwent surgery for gigantomastia with SM or INF. Demographic data, surgery details, and postoperative course data were obtained using the sixth-month two-point static discrimination test (TPD) of breasts. Patients were divided into SM and INF groups and statistically analyzed for differences in TPD and breast attributes, including suprasternal notch-to-nipple distance, ptosis grade, age, smoking history, parity, and body mass index. Results Intergroup analysis revealed significant differences between the SM and INF groups in TPD, with mean values of 21.03 ± 4.28 and 33.39 ± 6.91, respectively. The correlations between TPD results were tested, and only ptosis grades 2-4 and right suprasternal notch-nipple-areolar complex (NAC) distance were related. Conclusions The SM technique has better sensibility because the distance for transposition of the NAC to the newly designated position is shorter.