Abstract
Most COVID-19 vaccine trials have focused on recipient protection, not protection of their contacts, a critical need. As a subunit intranasal COVID-19 vaccine reduced nasopharyngeal virus more than did an intramuscular (IM) vaccine, we hypothesized that this vaccine might reduce onward transmission to others. We vaccinated hamsters with either the IM-administrated Moderna mRNA vaccine twice or one dose of mRNA IM followed by adjuvanted subunit intranasal vaccine. 24 hours after SARS-CoV-2 challenge, these animals were housed with naïve recipients in a contactless chamber that allows airborne transmission. Onward airborne transmission was profoundly blocked: the donor and recipients of the intranasal vaccine-boosted group had lower oral and lung viral loads (VL), which correlated with mucosal ACE2 inhibition activity. These data strongly support the use of the intranasal vaccine as a boost to protect not only the vaccinated person, but also people exposed to the vaccinated person, a key public health goal. AUTHOR SUMMARY: Natural transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is primarily airborne, through the respiratory mucosal route. However, current licensed COVID-19 vaccines are all intramuscular and induce more systemic than mucosal immunity. Here, we did a head-to-head comparison of COVID-19 booster vaccines on SARS-CoV-2 onward transmission. We found that compared to boosting with a Moderna mRNA systemic vaccine, a nanoparticle intranasal COVID-19 vaccine much more effectively prevents onward airborne transmission to naïve recipient hamsters. The protection was correlated with local mucosal antibody. Thus, a mucosal nanoparticle vaccine should be considered for preventing onward airborne transmission, a key public health necessity that has not been adequately studied.