Abstract
BACKGROUND: Two required inputs to mathematical models of sexually transmitted infections are the average duration in epidemiological risk states (e.g., selling sex) and the average rates of sexual partnership change. These variables are often only available as aggregate estimates from published cross-sectional studies, and may be subject to distributional, sampling, censoring, and measurement biases. METHODS: We explore adjustments for these biases using aggregate estimates of duration in sex work and numbers of reported sexual partners from a published 2011 survey of female sex worker in Eswatini. We develop adjustments from first principles, and construct Bayesian hierarchical models to reflect our mechanistic assumptions about the bias-generating processes. RESULTS: We show that different mechanisms of bias for duration in sex work may "cancel out" by acting in opposite directions, but that failure to consider some mechanisms could over- or underestimate duration in sex work by factors approaching 2. We also show that conventional interpretations of sexual partner numbers are biased due to implicit assumptions about partnership duration, but that unbiased estimators of partnership change rate can be defined that explicitly incorporate a given partnership duration. We highlight how the unbiased estimator is most important when the survey recall period and partnership duration are similar in length. CONCLUSIONS: While we explore these bias adjustments using a particular dataset, and in the context of deriving inputs for mathematical modelling, we expect that our approach and insights would be applicable to other datasets and motivations for quantifying sexual behaviour data.