Abstract
In recent years, resistance to the benzimidazole (BZ) and tetrahydropyrimidine (PYR) anthelmintics in global cyathostomin populations, has led to reliance on the macrocyclic lactone drugs (ML-of which ivermectin and moxidectin are licensed in horses) to control these parasites. Recently, the first confirmed case of resistance to both ivermectin (IVM) and moxidectin (MOX) was reported in the USA in yearlings imported from Ireland. This suggests that ML resistance in cyathostomins has emerged, and raises the possibility that regular movement of horses may result in rapid spread of ML resistant cyathostomins. Resistance may go undetected due to a lack of surveillance for ML efficacy. Here, we report anthelmintic efficacies in cyathostomins infecting UK Thoroughbreds on four studs. Faecal egg count reduction tests (FECRT) were performed to define resistance (resistance = FECR <95% lower credible interval (LCI) < 90%). Stud A yearlings had FECRs of 36.4-78.6% (CI:15.7-86.3) after three IVM treatments, 72.6% (CI: 50.8-85.2) after MOX, and 80.8% (CI: 61.9-90.0) after PYR. Mares on stud A had a FECR of 97.8% (CI: 93.3-99.9) and 98% (95.1-99.4) after IVM and MOX treatment, respectively. Resistance to MLs was not found in yearlings or mares on studs B, C or D with FECR after MOX OR IVM treatment ranging from 99.8 to 99.9% (95.4-100); although yearlings on studs B, C and D all had an egg reappearance period (ERP) of six weeks for MOX and stud C had a four-week ERP for IVM. This study describes the first confirmed case of resistance to both licensed ML drugs on a UK Thoroughbred stud and highlights the urgent need for a) increased awareness of the threat of ML resistant parasites infecting horses, and b) extensive surveillance of ML efficacy against cyathostomin populations in the UK, to gauge the extent of the problem.