Efficacy of different preoperative antiseptics in preventing a risk of surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta‑analysis of randomized controlled trials

不同术前消毒剂预防手术部位感染风险的疗效:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infection (SSI) is a predominant postoperative complication that markedly increases health care expenses. Published systematic reviews, meta‑analyses and international guidelines vary in their recommendations for the most effective preoperative skin antiseptic solutions and their concentrations. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of different preoperative antiseptics for prevent‑ ing the risk of SSIs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A complete search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases to collect peer‑reviewed articles. RESULTS: This meta‑analysis included 10 587 surgical patients from 18 randomized clinical trials to determine the effectiveness of chlorhexidine in alcohol (CHA; 0.5%, 2%-2.5%, and 4%) with aqueous or alcoholic iodine in preventing postoperative SSIs. This meta‑analysis found that 2%-2.5% CHA is the most effective preoperative antiseptic for preventing SSIs, with significant reduction in their incidence and significant antimicrobial activity. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this meta‑analysis indicate that for patients undergoing any type of surgery, the use of 2%-2.5% CHA for skin preparation is the most effective method for preventing SSIs.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。