Abstract
The manipulation of gene expression requires complete control of space, time and level of expression. In Drosophila , the UAS/GAL4 system has been instrumental in achieving spatial control, but the pursuit for the ideal system for temporal control is ongoing. One strategy used by many groups is to use GAL80. Two different kinds of GAL80 transgenic constructs have been reported but have never been compared directly. Here, we characterize and compare the repression ability of the GAL80ts and Tet-off GAL80 transgenes by two different assays. We found that GAL80ts was generally more efficient than Tet-off GAL80 and that the level of repression was dependent on the GAL4 driver, and did not necessarily correlate with expression level. We also investigated the level of expression upon inactivation of GAL80ts. The level and kinetics of inactivation were found to differ depending on the GAL4 driver and the stage of the life cycle, and in many cases the inactivation was incomplete. These results emphasize that it is essential to measure experimentally the level of expression under repressed and unrepressed states when multiple GAL4 drivers are used with GAL80 transgenes.