Abstract
The transition from targeted to exome or genome sequencing in clinical contexts requires quality standards, such as targeted sequencing, in order to be fully adopted. However, no clear recommendations or methodology have emerged for evaluating this technological evolution. We developed a structured method based on four run-specific sequencing metrics and seven sample-specific sequencing metrics for evaluating the performance of exome sequencing strategies to replace targeted strategies. The indicators include quality metrics and coverage performance on gene panels and OMIM morbid genes. We applied this general strategy to three different exome kits and compared them with a myopathy-targeted sequencing method. After having achieved 80 million reads, all-tested exome kits generated data suitable for clinical diagnosis. However, significant differences in the coverage and PCR duplicates were observed between the kits. These are two main criteria to consider for the initial implementation with high-quality assurance. This study aims to assist molecular diagnostic laboratories in adopting and evaluating exome sequencing kits in a diagnostic context compared to the strategy used previously. A similar strategy could be used to implement whole-genome sequencing for diagnostic purposes.