Health and economic cost estimates of short-term total and wildfire PM2.5 exposure on work loss: using the consecutive California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) data 2015-2018

利用2015-2018年加州健康访谈调查(CHIS)连续数据,估算短期总PM2.5和野火PM2.5暴露对工作损失的健康和经济成本

阅读:1

Abstract

INSTRUCTION: To help determine the health protectiveness of government regulations and policies for air pollutant control for Americans, our study aimed to investigate the health and economic impacts of work loss due to sickness associated with daily all-source and wildfire-specific PM(2.5) (particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than 2.5 μm) exposures in California. METHODS: We linked the 2015-2018 California Health Interview Survey respondents' geocoded home addresses to daily PM(2.5) estimated by satellites and atmospheric modelling simulations and wildfire-related PM(2.5) from Community Multiscale Air Quality models. We calculated and applied the coefficient for the association between daily PM(2.5) exposure and work loss from regression analyses to the Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program-Community Edition (BenMAP-CE) platform to assess the health and economic impacts of PM(2.5) exposure on work loss due to sickness. RESULTS: We observed that each 1 µg/m(3) increase in daily total PM(2.5) exposure will lead to about 1 million days of work loss per year ranging from 1.1 to 1.6 million person-days, and the related economic loss was $310-390 million. Wildfire smoke alone could contribute to 0.7-2.6 million work-loss days with a related economic loss of $129-521 million per year in 2015-2018. Using the function coefficient in the current BenMAP, the excess work-loss days due to sickness was about 250 000 days and the estimated economic loss was about $45-50 million for each 1 µg/m(3) increase in daily total PM(2.5) exposure, and wildfire smoke alone would lead to 0.17-0.67 million work-loss days with related economic loss of $31-128 million per year during the same period. CONCLUSIONS: Both conventional and wildfire-specific sources of PM(2.5) produced substantial work loss and cost in California. Updating the current BenMAP-CE calculations for work-loss days will be essential in quantifying the current health impacts of PM(2.5) to help inform the policies and regulations to protect public health.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。