Abstract
Sex allocation theory generally assumes maternal control of offspring sex and makes few predictions for populations evolving under paternal control. Using population genetic simulations, we show that maternal and paternal control of the sex ratio lead to different equilibrium sex ratios in structured populations. Sex ratios evolved under paternal control are more female biased. This effect is dependent on the population subdivision; fewer founding individuals leads to both more biased sex ratios and a greater difference between the paternal and maternal equilibria. In addition, sexual antagonism evolves in simulations with both maternally- and paternally-acting loci. Maternally-acting loci continuously accumulate ever more female-biasing effects as male-biasing effects accumulate at paternally-acting loci. The difference in evolved sex-ratio equilibria and the evolution of sexual antagonism can be largely explained by differences in the between-group variance of maternal and paternal effects in the founding generation. These theoretical results apply to any system with biparental autosomal influence over offspring sex, opening up an exciting new line of questioning.