Abstract
To compare the image quality and fat attenuation index (FAI) of coronary artery CT angiography (CCTA) under different tube voltages between deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V (ASIR-V). Three hundred one patients who underwent CCTA with automatic tube current modulation were prospectively enrolled and divided into two groups: 120 kV group and low tube voltage group. Images were reconstructed using ASIR-V level 50% (ASIR-V50%) and high-strength DLIR (DLIR-H). In the low tube voltage group, the voltage was selected according to Chinese BMI classification: 70 kV (BMI < 24 kg/m(2)), 80 kV (24 kg/m(2) ≤ BMI < 28 kg/m(2)), 100 kV (BMI ≥ 28 kg/m(2)). At the same tube voltage, the subjective and objective image quality, edge rise distance (ERD), and FAI between different algorithms were compared. Under different tube voltages, we used DLIR-H to compare the differences between subjective, objective image quality, and ERD. Compared with the 120 kV group, the DLIR-H image noise of 70 kV, 80 kV, and 100 kV groups increased by 36%, 25%, and 12%, respectively (all P < 0.001); contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), subjective score, and ERD were similar (all P > 0.05). In the 70 kV, 80 kV, 100 kV, and 120 kV groups, compared with ASIR-V50%, DLIR-H image noise decreased by 50%, 53%, 47%, and 38-50%, respectively; CNR, subjective score, and FAI value increased significantly (all P < 0.001), ERD decreased. Compared with 120 kV tube voltage, the combination of DLIR-H and low tube voltage maintains image quality. At the same tube voltage, compared with ASIR-V, DLIR-H improves image quality and FAI value.