NUTRITIONAL OR ACTIVE VITAMIN D FOR THE CORRECTION OF MINERAL METABOLISM ABNORMALITIES IN NON-DIALYSIS CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE PATIENTS?

营养性维生素D或活性维生素D能否纠正非透析慢性肾病患者的矿物质代谢异常?

阅读:1

Abstract

CONTEXT: Benefits of vitamin D therapies in chronic kidney disease (CKD) are debated. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of medium-term native (VitD) and active (VDRA) vitamin D on parameters of mineral metabolism and arterial function in non-dialysis CKD. DESIGN: Open-label, active comparator, randomized study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight adult patients, vitamin D naïve, CKD stage 3 to 5 with increased parathyroid hormone (iPTH) were randomized to receive either oral cholecalciferol 1000UI/day (n=24) or paricalcitol 1mcg/day (n=24) for 6 months. Median changes at end of study vs. baseline in serum calcidiol, iPTH, total alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) were the efficacy parameters. RESULTS: Higher increase in calcidiol (15.5 [95%CI 13.3; 17.2] vs. 0.4 [95%CI -6.1; 3.7]ng/mL, p<0.001) were found in VitD group. Conversely, the decline of iPTH (-35.2 [95%CI -83; 9] vs. 13.3 [95%CI -8.1; 35]pg/mL, p=0.008) and ALP (-34 [95%CI -58; -11] vs. -10 [95%CI -23; -2]U/L, p=0.02) were greater after paricalcitol. More subjects experienced iPTH decrease in VDRA group (71% vs. 39%, p=0.03). The variation in CAVI and the incidence of hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia were similar. CONCLUSIONS: It seems that secondary hyperparathyroidism was more efficiently treated by VDRA, whereas cholecalciferol better corrected the calcidiol deficiency in non-dialysis CKD.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。