Clinical utility of i-gel(®) and BlockBuster™ supraglottic devices for airway management in postburn injury contracture neck patients under general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial

i-gel® 和 BlockBuster™ 声门上装置在全身麻醉下治疗烧伤后颈部挛缩患者气道管理中的临床应用价值:一项随机对照试验

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Post burn injury contracture (PBC) neck patients pose a unique challenge for the anesthesiologists. The use of supraglottic device (SGDs) for managing such patients is being increasingly used. We compared i-gel(®) and LMA BlockBuster™ in PBC adult patients under general anesthesia (GA). METHODS: The study included 63 subjects with mild/moderate PBC neck of either sex with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status I and II under GA. Patients with intraoral pathology, mouth opening <2.5 cm, and severe contracture were excluded. Patients were randomly assigned to i-gel(®) (I) and BlockBuster™ (B) groups. The primary objective of the study was the time for successful insertion. First attempt success rate, oropharyngeal leak pressures (OLP), and complications were also assessed. RESULTS: Mean insertion time was significantly less in Group I as compared to Group B (17.35 ± 1.43 vs. 21.32 ± 1.10 s; P < 0.001), OLP in Group B was significantly higher as compared to Group I (34.03 ± 1.33 vs. 25.23 ± 3.04 cm of H(2)O; P < 0.001). Group I was found to be statistically easier to insert as compared to Group B (P = 0.011) with reduced requirement of airway maneuvering to insert the device (P = 0.017). Groups were similar in terms of complications. CONCLUSION: SGDs are attractive option for airway management in mild/moderate degree of PBC neck. i-gel(®) having shorter insertion time with easier insertion can be favorable at times of emergency while use of LMA BlockBuster™ can be preferred to reduce the risk of aspiration owing to higher OLP.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。