Abstract
BACKGROUND: Carcinogenic risk assessment studies have been repeatedly improved and are still being debated to find a goal. Evaluation might be changed if new approaches would be applied to some chemicals which means that new approaches may change the final assessment. In this paper, the risk assessment of a chemical, in particular the proper carcinogenicity, is examined using the long-banned food additive, 2-(2-furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl)-acrylamide, AF-2, as a case study. RESULTS: First, Ames tests were carried out using strains TA1535, TA100, TA1538, and TA98 and their nitroreductase-deficient strains YG7127, YG7128, YG7129, and YG7130. The results showed that mutagenic activity was reduced by about 50% in the nitroreductase-deficient strains, indicating that part of the mutagenic activity shown in Ames test was due to bacterial metabolism. Second, in vivo genotoxicity tests were conducted, including the one that had not been developed in 1970's. Both a micronucleus test and a gene mutation assay using transgenic mice were negative. Third, assuming it is a genotoxic carcinogen, the virtual safety dose of 550 μg/day was calculated from the TD(50) in rats with a probability of 10(-5). CONCLUSION: AF-2 has been shown to be carcinogenic to rodents and has previously been indicated to be genotoxic in vitro. However, the present in vivo genotoxicity study, it was negative in the forestomach, a target organ for cancer, particularly in the gene mutation assay in transgenic mice. Considering the daily intake of AF-2 in the 1970s and its virtually safety dose, the carcinogenic risk of AF-2 could be considered acceptable.