Abstract
The prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in elderly people has expanded rapidly. Considering cognitive impairment and being prone to hypoglycemia of the elder, the pros and cons of oral hypoglycemic agents (OHA) should be reassessed in this population. Pioglitazone might be appropriate for elderly DM patients because of its insulin-sensitizing effect and low risk of hypoglycemia. By using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, 191,937 types 2 diabetes patients aged ≥65 years under treatment between 2005 and 2013 were identified and further divided into two groups according to whether they received pioglitazone (pioglitazone group) or other OHAs (non-pioglitazone group) in the 3 months preceding their first outpatient visit date after 65 years of age, with a diagnosis of T2DM. Propensity score stabilization weight (PSSW) was used to balance the baseline characteristics. In results, the pioglitazone group (n = 17,388) exhibited a lower rate (per person-years) of major advanced cardiovascular events MACCE (2.76% vs. 3.03%, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87-0.95), new- diagnosis dementia (1.32% vs. 1.46%, HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.84-0.98) but a higher rate of new-diagnosis bone fractures (5.37% vs. 4.47%, HR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.19-1.28) than the non-pioglitazone group (n = 174,549). In conclusion, using pioglitazone may reduce the risks of MACCE and dementia but increases the probability of bone fractures in the elderly DM population.