Abstract
Background Surgical procedures such as excision of a growth or lesion lead to soft tissue or oral mucosal defects. These defects require a proper surgical dressing to promote better wound healing and to avoid infection and scarring. A collagen membrane is one of the most commonly used surgical dressings because of its ease of adaptability to defects and its inherent ability to promote epithelialization and inhibition of pain through the indirect mechanism of preventing infection of the surgical site. Collagen also serves as a reservoir of regenerative factors. The regenerative potential increases as porosity decreases. The novel bovine-derived collagen membrane used in this current study has an average porosity of 20 microns which increases the availability of regenerative factors. Objective The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness between a novel matrix-modified bovine collagen membrane (SurgiColl) and a conventional bovine collagen membrane for promoting wound healing for oral mucosal or soft tissue defects. Materials and methods This clinical trial was conducted in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital. The sample size of the study was 20, divided into two groups: novel bovine collagen (Surgicoll-Mesh) (Group 1) and conventional bovine collagen (Group 2) with 10 participants in each group. The randomization process was adopted. The parameters assessed were epithelialization, granulation, and wound contraction at the end of two weeks. All the parameters were assessed using a standardized visual assessment scale. Statistical analysis was done using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0 (Released 2015; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States), and an independent sample t-test was done at 95% confidence interval. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The difference in epithelialization between the two groups was statistically significant with a p-value of 0.015 (<0.05). The difference in granulation tissue formation between the two groups was statistically significant with a p-value of 0.015 (<0.05). The difference in wound contraction at the end of two weeks between the two groups was also statistically significant with a p-value of 0.005 (<0.05). Group 1 showed superior results compared to Group 2 for all the outcomes assessed. Conclusion The novel bovine-derived collagen membrane (SurgiColl-Mesh) was superior in its properties of wound healing for oral mucosal or soft tissue defects than the conventional bovine collagen membrane.