Abstract
BACKGROUND: Emerging tick-transmitted illnesses are increasingly recognized in the United States (US). To identify multiple potential tick-borne pathogens in patients from the Upper Midwest and Northeast US with suspected anaplasmosis, we used state-of-the-art methods (polymerase chain reaction [PCR] and paired serology) to test samples from patients in whom anaplasmosis had been excluded. METHODS: Five hundred sixty-eight patients without anaplasmosis had optimal samples available for confirmation of alternative tick-borne pathogens, including PCR and/or paired serology (acute-convalescent interval ≤42 days). RESULTS: Among 266 paired serology evaluations, for which the median acute-convalescent sampling interval was 28 (interquartile range, 21-33) days, we identified 35 acute/recent infections (24 [9%] Borrelia burgdorferi; 6 [2%] Ehrlichia chaffeensis/Ehrlichia muris subsp eauclairensis [EC/EME]; 3 [1%] spotted fever group rickettsioses [SFGR], and 2 [<1%] Babesia microti) in 33 (12%) patients. Two had concurrent or closely sequential infections (1 B burgdorferi and EC/EME, and 1 B burgdorferi and SFGR). Using multiplex PCR and reverse-transcription PCR, we identified 7 acute infections (5/334 [1%] Borrelia miyamotoi and 2/334 [1%] B microti) in 5 (1%) patients, including 2 with B microti-B miyamotoi coinfection, but no Borrelia mayonii, SFGR, Candidatus Anaplasma capra, Heartland virus, or Powassan virus infections. Thus, among 568 patients with ruled-out anaplasmosis, 38 (6.7%) had ≥1 agent of tick-borne illness identified, with 33 patients (35 infections) diagnosed by paired serology and 5 additional patients (7 infections) by PCR. CONCLUSIONS: By identifying other tick-borne agents in patients in whom anaplasmosis had been excluded, we demonstrate that emerging tick-borne infections will be identified if specifically sought.