Assessing the Causal Impact of Social Isolation on Angina Risk: Evidence from a Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study

评估社会隔离对心绞痛风险的因果影响:来自双样本孟德尔随机化研究的证据

阅读:1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Previous observational studies have indicated an association between social isolation and an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases such as angina, but various factors may confound these studies. This study employs Mendelian randomization to investigate the causal relationship between social isolation and angina, minimizing potential confounding effects. METHODS: We conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis using genetic variants as instrumental variables for social isolation. Genetic data for social isolation was sourced from a large-scale genome-wide association study (GWAS), while outcome data for angina came from an independent GWAS dataset. RESULTS: Our findings suggest that a higher genetic predisposition to social isolation and loneliness is significantly associated with an increased risk of developing angina (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.07, 95% confidence interval [Cl]: 1.03-1.11, P< 0.01). The analysis did not provide strong evidence of horizontal pleiotropy affecting the results. This supports the hypothesis that social isolation may causally contribute to the risk of angina. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates the hypothesis that social isolation causally influences the risk of angina and emphasizes the importance of interventions targeting social isolation and loneliness as social factors in the prevention and management of cardiovascular diseases.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。