Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To re-examine the use of non-carbapenems (NCBPs), specifically piperacillin/tazobactam and cefepime, for ESBL-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) urinary tract infections (UTIs). PATIENTS: Retrospective cohort study of adults hospitalized between January 2016 and June 2020 with pyuria on urinalysis, a urine culture positive for ESBL-E treated with a study antibiotic (meropenem, ertapenem, cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam) and did not meet criteria for study exclusion. METHODS: To compare carbapenems (CBPs) with cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam for the treatment of ESBL-E UTI. The primary outcome was clinical cure, defined as complete resolution of signs and symptoms of infection. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, recurrence within 30 days and resistance emergence within 30 days. RESULTS: One-hundred and thirty-three patients were included, based on definitive therapy received; 69 (51.9%) received CBP and 64 (48.1%) received NCBP therapy. Of the total patient population, 17 (12.8%) were admitted to the ICU, 84 (63.1%) had a complicated UTI and 64 (48.1%) had pyelonephritis. There was no difference in clinical cure between the CBP and NCBP groups (95.7% versus 96.9%, P = 0.999). Additionally, no differences in secondary outcomes were observed. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with CBPs, cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam resulted in similar clinical cure, in-hospital mortality, recurrence and resistance emergence in the treatment of ESBL-E UTI.