Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous reports attempted to evaluate bladder cancer using 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) by washing out the excreted FDG with a diuretic. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of diuretic FDG PET/plain CT (drtPET/CT) and diuretic FDG PET/contrast-enhanced CT (drtPET/ceCT) in the assessment of upper urinary tract cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 66 patients underwent drtPET/CT for suspected upper urinary tract cancer (UUTC). The study targeted 29 patients who were strongly suspected of having UUTC and underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the upper urinary tract. A total of 29 (24 male, five female) patients, with a mean ± SD age of 73 ± 3 (range, 43-84) years, had a suspected neoplasm in the upper urinary tract. They underwent FDG PET/plain and contrast-enhanced CT before and after a diuretic and MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). A urologist and a physician board-certified in nuclear medicine and radiology independently interpreted the standard PET/CT (stdPET/CT), drtPET/CT, drtPET/ceCT, ceCT, and MRI with DWI images. Interobserver agreement and the diagnostic performance of each modality were evaluated. RESULTS: The kappa values of stdPET/CT, drtPET/CT, drtPET/ceCT, ceCT, and MRI were 0.381, 0.567, 0.7031, 0.448, and 0.185, respectively, with drtPET/ceCT showing the highest kappa value and the only one with good interobserver agreement (>60%). The area under the curve of drtPET/ceCT was 0.92, which was significantly higher than those of stdPET/CT (P=0.027) and MRI (P=0.047). CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, drtPET/ceCT had the best diagnostic performance and the highest interobserver agreement for detecting upper urinary tract urothelial cancers.