Abstract
Objective: The aim of the study was to find tools to assess patient characteristics that would help in choosing between orthotopic neobladder and ileal conduit in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. An additional goal was to search for aids that improve preoperative counseling to support patients in the decision-making process. Methods: A systematic review of MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases was conducted, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement, in April 2024. Inclusion criteria were specified in PICO format. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full papers. Upon study selection, the results and conclusions from the studies were abstracted and quantitatively summarized in the results section of this article. Results: Seven articles, involving a total 834 patients, were included. One article described frailty, two reviewed cognitive status, one article described functional dexterity, one described personality, two articles reviewed patients' values and goals, and one article reviewed role of patient-physician dialogue in the context of choosing UD after RC. The reviewed articles identified tools and approaches that could be valuable in evaluating the suitability for continent urinary diversion (CUD) or incontinent urinary diversion (ICUD). Conclusions: This is the first systematic review that summarizes the new available methods of patient assessment which improve preoperative counseling and choosing the most suitable UD after RC. Efficient tools for this purpose are still missing, and further studies that will aid in creating a simple aid for patient selection are necessary.