Abstract
Infective endocarditis (IE) is a serious and diagnostically challenging condition. [(18)F]FDG PET/CT is valuable for evaluating suspected IE, but it is susceptible to motion-related artefacts. This study investigated the potential benefits of cardiac motion correction for [(18)F]FDG PET/CT. In this prospective study, patients underwent [(18)F]FDG PET/CT for suspected IE, combined with a conventional cardiac gating sequence, a data-driven cardiac and respiratory gating sequence (CardioFreeze(TM)), or both. Scans were performed in adherence to EANM guidelines and assessors were blinded to patients' clinical contexts. Final diagnosis of IE was established based on multidisciplinary consensus after a minimum of 4 months follow-up and surgical findings, whenever performed. Seven patients participated in the study, undergoing both an ungated [(18)F] FDG-PET/CT and a scan with either conventional cardiac gating, CardioFreeze(TM), or both. Cardiac motion correction improved the interpretability of [(18)F]FDG PET/CT in four out of five patients with valvular IE lesions, regardless of the method of motion correction used, which was statistically significant by Wilcoxon's signed rank test: p = 0.046. In one patient the motion-corrected sequence confirmed the diagnosis of endocarditis, which had been missed on non-gated PET. The performance of the two gating sequences was comparable. In conclusion, in this exploratory study, cardiac motion correction of [(18)F]FDG PET/CT improved the interpretability of [(18)F]FDG PET/CT. This may improve the sensitivity of PET/CT for suspected IE. Further larger comparative studies are necessary to confirm the additive value of these cardiac motion correction methods.