Pediatric tuina for recurrent respiratory tract infection in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

儿童推拿治疗儿童复发性呼吸道感染:系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effects and safety of pediatric tuina for recurrent respiratory tract infections (RRTIs). METHODS: Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP, and CBM databases were searched from inception to September 20 2023. Two authors independently selected studies, collected data, and evaluated methodological quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Revman 5.4 was used for the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Fifteen randomized controlled trials involving 1420 pediatric patients were included in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis indicated that pediatric tuina significantly reduced the incidence of RRTIs [MD -1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) (-1.77, -0.46)], decreased infection duration (MD -1.16 days, 95% CI [- 1.66, - 0.66]), improved IgA (MD 0.25 g/L, 95% CI [0.09, 0.41]), IgG (MD 1.64 g/L; 95% CI [0.82, 2.45]), CD3+ (MD 3.33%, 95% CI [0.74, 5.92]), CD4+ (MD 4.78%, 95% CI [2.08, 7.48]), CD4+/CD8+ ratio (MD 0.27%, 95% CI [0.08, 0.47]), and total effective rate (RR 1.19, 95% CI [1.13, 1.25]). However, IgM levels (MD 0.26 g/L, 95% CI [-0.26, 0.81]) and CD8+ (MD -1.36%, 95% CI [- 3.12, 0.41]) were not significantly different between the groups. Moreover, no Tuina-linked adverse reactions were observed. CONCLUSION: Pediatric tuina has shown positive effects in RRTIs treatment. However, these results should be interpreted with caution owing to study quality. Further large-scale and high-quality randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。