Prediction of intracranial hemorrhage after internal carotid artery stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis by computed tomography perfusion

利用计算机断层扫描灌注成像预测有症状的重度颈动脉狭窄患者行颈内动脉支架置入术后颅内出血。

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To explore the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after internal carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis by computed tomography perfusion (CTP). METHODS: The clinical and imaging data of 87 patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis who underwent CTP before CAS were retrospectively analyzed. The absolute values of the cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), mean transit time (MTT), and time to peak (TTP) were calculated. The relative values (i.e., the rCBF, rCBV, rMTT, and rTTP), defined as the comparison between ipsilateral and contralateral hemispheres, were also derived. The degree of carotid artery stenosis was divided into 3 grades, and the Willis' circle was classified into 4 types. The relationship between the occurrence of the ICH and CTP parameters, the Willis' circle type, and the clinical baseline data were evaluated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the most effective CTP parameter for the prediction of ICH. RESULTS: In total, 8 patients (9.2%) developed ICH after CAS. The results showed that the CBF (P=0.025), MTT (P=0.029), rCBF (P=0.006), rMTT (P=0.004), rTTP (P=0.006), and the degree of carotid artery stenosis (P=0.021) differed significantly between the ICH group and non-ICH group. The ROC curve analysis showed that the CTP parameter with the maximal area under the curve (AUC) for ICH was rMTT (AUC =0.808), which indicated that patients with an rMTT >1.88 were more likely to develop ICH (sensitivity: 62.5%, specificity: 96.2%). The occurrence of ICH after CAS was not related to the type of Willis' circle (P=0.713). CONCLUSIONS: CTP can be used to predict ICH after CAS in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis, and patients with a preoperative rMTT >1.88 should be closely monitored for evidence of ICH after CAS.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。