Abstract
BACKGROUND: Guidelines on the management of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) recommend consideration of endovascular therapies (EVT) for patients at intermediate-high risk. However, long-term data on the outcomes of patients after EVT as compared to medical therapy is lacking. This study aimed to compare outcomes of patients receiving EVT as compared to medical therapy alone at 3 to 6 months. METHODS: In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, 190 patients with PE underwent evaluation for presence of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction by transthoracic echocardiogram, residual perfusion defects on ventilation-perfusion scanning, and functional capacity by 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) at 3 to 6 month follow-up. RESULTS: Fifty-eight (31%) patients received EVT for the management of their acute PE. At follow-up (median 120 [97-170] days), 71% of patients who received EVT had normalization of RV function compared with only 34% of patients who received medical therapy alone (P < .001). Patients who received EVT had a significantly greater increase in their estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = .001), decrease in N-terminal proB-type natriuretic peptide (P = .003), and decrease in hemoglobin values (P = .018). Patients with intermediate-high to high risk PE who received EVT had significantly greater distance achieved on their 6MWD as compared to those who received medical therapy alone (P = .025). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with acute PE who received EVT plus medical therapy were more likely to achieve normalization of RV dysfunction at 3 to 6 month follow-up compared to patients who received medical therapy alone. These data suggest that EVT is an effective therapy option for acute PE in intermediate-high and high risk patients with potential durable long-term benefits.