Short-Course Versus Prolonged-Course Antimicrobial Therapy in Adults With Catheter-Related Septic Thrombosis: A Propensity-Weighted Retrospective Study

导管相关性脓毒血栓成人患者短期与长期抗菌治疗的比较:一项倾向性评分加权回顾性研究

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Optimal duration of antimicrobial therapy (AT) for catheter-related septic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is unknown. We aimed to compare the outcomes of patients receiving short-course AT (≤21 days) versus prolonged-course AT (>21 days). METHODS: This was a monocentric retrospective study comparing adults with catheter-related septic DVT from 2015 to 2020 treated with short- or prolonged-course AT. A propensity score-weighted analysis was used to mitigate potential bias. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality or recurrent bloodstream infection 30 days after AT discontinuation. RESULTS: Of 172 patients with catheter-related septic DVT, 104 were treated with prolonged-course AT and 68 with short-course AT. In the propensity score analysis, we found no significant difference in 30-day all-cause mortality or relapse between the 2 groups (inverse probability of treatment weighted hazard ratio [wHR], 2.16 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .68-6.88]; P = .192). No differences in 90-day all-cause mortality and 90-day relapse were observed between the treatment groups (wHR, 1.01 [95% CI, .49-2.05], P = .987 and 1.13 [95% CI, .08-15.62], P = .928, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A 21-day AT could be an effective and safe option to treat catheter-related septic DVT. Further randomized studies are needed to establish the optimal duration of AT for patients with catheter-related septic DVT.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。