Abstract
This paper presents a simple comparative method for evaluating the impact of concrete design on the effectiveness of repair with the electrochemical chloride extraction (ECE) process of reinforced concrete structures. This comparison covered two concretes with different types of used cement. Penetration of chloride ions to induce corrosion processes was accelerated with the electric field. However, the corrosion process itself occurred naturally. When the corrosion process was found to pose a risk to the reinforcement, the profile of chloride ion concentration was determined at the depth of concrete cover. Corrosion current intensity during migration and extraction processes of chloride ions was measured with the LPR method. Then, this serious condition for the structure was repaired with electrochemical chloride extraction. Rates of chloride extraction were determined from the derived concentration profiles. It should be noted that the critical concentration C(crit) = 0.4% at the rebar surface was reached after 21 days of the migration process. Moreover, after the same time of extraction, the concentration was reduced by 95% at the rebar surface, which could suggest that extraction rate was slower than chloride ion migration to concrete within the electric field. Using the migration coefficient for predicting the extraction time, as well as ignoring the variability of the extraction coefficient and the initial concentration over time, may result in too short or unnecessarily long extraction times.