Abstract
In this study we evaluated the outcomes of non-clinical toxicity studies of various SARS-CoV-2 vaccines produced with different manufacturing technologies, with focus on Repeated Dose Toxicity (RDT) and Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity (DART) studies. We found that RDT and DART studies at doses relevant for human treatment showed no adverse effects while remaining observations were expected findings including local reactogenicity, immune response and macroscopic findings at the injection site. We have also reviewed the European Medicines Agency (EMA) nonclinical assessment reports for market authorization. Regardless of utilized vaccine manufacturing technology EMA assessment of the non-clinical studies consisted most frequently of comments related to study design, species selection and missing data. Sponsors have often submitted platform studies (vaccine studies with the same technology/construct but using other antigens) as supplementary data. Animal model-based toxicity testing has shown rather small effects, which have been never serious adverse effects. The translational value to support clinical development is mainly to inflammatory effects, indicative of the primary action of the vaccines. From a 3R perspective supportive platform technology data consisting of previously executed RDT and DART studies from the same platform technology are encouraged to be implemented in the vaccine assessment process.