Abstract
BACKGROUND: GE Healthcare's new generation of deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR), the Revolution Apex CT is the first CT image reconstruction engine based on a deep neural network to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). It can generate high-quality CT images that restore the true texture with a low radiation dose. The aim of the present study was to assess the image quality of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) at 70 kVp with the DLIR algorithm as compared to the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASiR-V) algorithm in patients of different weight. METHODS: The study group comprised 96 patients who underwent CCTA examination at 70 kVp and were subdivided by body mass index (BMI) into normal-weight patients [48] and overweight patients [48]. ASiR-V40%, ASiR-V80%, DLIR-low, DLIR-medium, and DLIR-high images were obtained. The objective image quality, radiation dose, and subjective score of the two groups of images with different reconstruction algorithms were compared and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: In the overweight group, the noise of the DLIR image was lower than that of the routinely used ASiR-40%, and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of DLIR (H: 19.15±4.31; M: 12.68±2.91; L: 10.59±2.32) was higher than that of the ASiR-40% reconstructed image (8.39±1.46), with statistically significant differences (all P values <0.05). The subjective image quality evaluation of DLIR was significantly higher than that of ASiR-V reconstructed images (all P values <0.05), with the DLIR-H being the best. In a comparison of the normal-weight and overweight groups, the objective score of the ASiR-V-reconstructed image increased with increasing strength, but the subjective image evaluation decreased, and both differences (i.e., objective and subjective) were statistically significant (P<0.05). In general, the objective score of the DLIR reconstruction image between the two groups increased with increased noise reduction, and the DLIR-L image was the best. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in subjective image evaluation between the two groups. The effective dose (ED) of the normal-weight group and the overweight group was 1.36±0.42 and 1.59±0.46 mSv, respectively, and was significantly higher in the overweight group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: As the strength of the ASiR-V reconstruction algorithm increased, the objective image quality increased accordingly, but the high-strength ASiR-V changed the noise texture of the image, resulting in a decrease in the subjective score, which affected disease diagnosis. Compared with the ASiR-V reconstruction algorithm, the DLIR reconstruction algorithm improved the image quality and diagnostic reliability for CCTA in patients with different weights, especially in heavier patients.