Cemented versus Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Head Osteonecrosis: A Study Based on National Claim Data in South Korea

韩国基于全国医疗保险数据的研究:股骨头坏死患者采用骨水泥固定式与非骨水泥固定式全髋关节置换术的比较

阅读:1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare the rates of revision, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), and periprosthetic fracture (PPF) between patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) undergoing noncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) and cemented THA using a national claim data in South Korea. METHODS: We identified patients who received THA for ONFH from January 2007 to December 2018 using ICD diagnosis codes and procedural codes. Patients were categorized into two groups according to the fixation method: with or without cement. The survivorship of THA was calculated using the following end points: revision of both the cup and stem, revision of the single component, any type of revision, PJI, and PPF. RESULTS: A total of 40,606 patients: 3,738 patients (9.2%) with cement and 36,868 patients (90.7%) without cement, received THA for ONFH. The mean age of the noncemented fixation group (56.2 ± 13.2 years) was significantly lower than that of the cemented fixation group (57.0 ± 15.7 years, P = 0.003). The risk of revision and PJI was notably higher in cemented THA (hazard ratio: 1.44 [1.21 to 1.72] and 1.66 [1.36 to 2.04], respectively). Noncemented THA had a higher 12-year survivorship compared with cemented THA with any revision and PJI as the end point. DISCUSSION: Noncemented fixation had better survivorship than cemented fixation in patients with ONFH.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。