Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has raised a growing interest in phage display research. Sequencing depth is a pivotal parameter for using NGS. In the current study, we made a side-by-side comparison of two NGS platforms with different sequencing depths, denoted as lower-throughput (LTP) and higher-throughput (HTP). The capacity of these platforms for characterization of the composition, quality, and diversity of the unselected Ph.D.(TM)-12 Phage Display Peptide Library was investigated. Our results indicated that HTP sequencing detects a considerably higher number of unique sequences compared to the LTP platform, thus covering a broader diversity of the library. We found a larger percentage of singletons, a smaller percentage of repeated sequences, and a greater percentage of distinct sequences in the LTP datasets. These parameters suggest a higher library quality, resulting in potentially misleading information when using LTP sequencing for such assessment. Our observations showed that HTP reveals a broader distribution of peptide frequencies, thus revealing increased heterogeneity of the library by the HTP approach and offering a comparatively higher capacity for distinguishing peptides from each other. Our analyses suggested that LTP and HTP datasets show discrepancies in their peptide composition and position-specific distribution of amino acids within the library. Taken together, these findings lead us to the conclusion that a higher sequencing depth can yield more in-depth insights into the composition of the library and provide a more complete picture of the quality and diversity of phage display peptide libraries.