Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ectopic pregnancy is a common gynecological emergency that poses a significant risk of maternal mortality during the first trimester. It also increases the incidence of infertility and repeated ectopic pregnancy. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether there is a difference in the degree of tubal patency between salpingostomy and systemic treatment with methotrexate (MTX), as well as the odds of intrauterine pregnancy and repeat ectopic pregnancy, and the degree of tubal patency in salpingectomy with or without tubal suturing. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to April 2023. Four randomized controlled trials were included in the review. We analyzed the combined data using Review Manager 5.3 software and Stata 12.0 software, utilizing a random effects model. RESULTS: When comparing salpingostomy and systemic treatment with MTX, there was no significant difference in the degree of tubal patency (OR = 1.09, 95% CI (0.54-2.38), P = .83). For salpingostomy with or without tubal suturing, there were no significant differences in the rates of intrauterine pregnancy, repeat ectopic pregnancy, and tubal patency degree [(OR = 1.05, 95% CI (0.41-2.68), P = .92), (OR = 0.68, 95% CI (0.19-2.42), P = .92), (OR = 1.68, 95% CI (0.14-20.33), P = .68)]. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrates that systemic treatment with MTX is an effective treatment for patients who wish to preserve their fallopian tubes without undergoing surgery. This form of treatment can help avoid surgical procedures that may damage the fallopian tubes and improve fertility prospects. If choosing surgery, we believe that opting for salpingostomy without tubal suturing could reduce the operation time and minimize damage.