Abstract
BACKGROUND: We investigated whether cell cycle synchronization induced by the T-type calcium channel inhibitor mibefradil could increase tumoral 2-[(18)F] fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) uptake in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: Human prostate cancer cells (PC-3) were treated with 10 μM mibefradil for 24, 48, and 72 h to induce G1 arrest. Cell cycle distribution was analyzed at 0, 4, 8, 12, 15, 18, and 24 h after mibefradil withdrawal. Cellular uptake was measured after incubating cells with [(3)H] Deoxy-d-Glucose (DDG) for 1 h at the same time points used in the cell cycle analysis. The correlation between [(3)H] DDG uptake and each cell cycle phase was evaluated in the early (0-12 h) and late phases (15-24 h) of synchronization. In vivo FDG PET imaging was performed in PC-3-bearing mice at baseline, 24 h, and 48 h after mibefradil treatment. RESULTS: The G0/G1 fraction of PC-3 cells was significantly increased from 33.1% ± 0.2% to 60.9% ± 0.8% after 24 h mibefradil treatment, whereas the S and G2/M fractions were decreased from 36.3% ± 1.4% to 23.2% ± 1.1% and from 29.7% ± 1.3% to 14.9% ± 0.9%, respectively, which were similar to the results by serum starvation. Mibefradil treatment for 24, 48, and 72 h increased the number of cells in S phase at 18-24 h after withdrawal; however, only the 72 h treatment increased [(3)H] DDG uptake (145.8 ± 5.8% of control at 24 h after withdrawal). [(3)H] DDG uptake was positively correlated with the size of the S phase fraction and negatively correlated with the size of the G0/G1 fraction in the late phase of synchronization. DDG uptake was significantly increased by mibefradil-induced cell cycle synchronization and correlated with the sizes of cell cycle fractions. In vivo FDG PET imaging also demonstrated a significant increase in tumor uptake after mibefradil treatment. Quantified tumor FDG uptake (%ID/g) increased from 4.13 ± 2.10 to 4.7 ± 2.16 at 24 h, and 5.95 ± 2.57 at 48 h (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Cell cycle synchronization could be used to increase the diagnostic sensitivity of clinical FDG positron emission tomography.