Abstract
Introduction Standard of care management for open fractures historically mandates emergent systemic antibiotic administration, followed by urgent irrigation and debridement in the operating room, regardless of injury severity. However, significant controversy exists regarding the specific implementation and importance of these commonly accepted guidelines. We aimed to define differences in the management of grade 1 open distal radius fractures. Methods An anonymous online survey was distributed to attending surgeon members of either the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) between January 2019 and April 2019 or the New York Society for Surgery of the Hand (NYSSH) in January 2019. Results A total of 68 attending surgeons responded to the survey. A total of 24 OTA members and 40 NYSSH members replied and were included in the study. Several factors influenced management in addition to the level of contamination. Of the surgeons, 68% stated that litigation was not a major factor of concern. When compared to surgeons who trained in trauma fellowships, more surgeons who trained in hand/upper extremity fellowships considered closed reduction alone as reasonable definitive treatment (when excluding antibiotic administration and debridement considerations, p = 0.024) and oral antibiotics as a supplement to IV antibiotics (p < 0.001). Of the surgeons, 90% would nonoperatively treat a patient who presented with a grade 1 open distal radius fracture greater than 72 hours after injury with stable and acceptable alignment on X-rays. Conclusion Some surgeons are willing to deviate from standard-of-care management protocols.