Abstract
Magnetic ureteric stents offer a novel approach for simplifying stent removal, minimizing patient discomfort, and reducing procedural burdens. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized evidence from 12 studies involving 1,297 patients to evaluate the efficacy and safety of magnetic stent removal compared to conventional methods. Key outcomes included reductions in procedural pain scores, shorter removal times, and high patient satisfaction. Complication rates for magnetic stents were comparable to conventional stents, while cost analysis favored magnetic removal due to reduced resource utilization. These findings suggest magnetic stents are a safe, effective, and patient-friendly alternative. Further research with larger sample sizes is warranted to confirm these benefits.