Measuring Restrictive Lung Disease Severity Using FEV(1) vs TLC

利用FEV1与TLC评估限制性肺疾病严重程度

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No clear parameters currently exist to grade severity in restrictive lung disease as for other ventilatory diseases. This article evaluates whether total lung capacity (TLC) or forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) better correlates with the symptomatology of patients with restrictive lung disease. METHODS: A retrospective review of 6461 patient records at Veterans Affairs Caribbean Healthcare System in Puerto Rico was conducted, and 414 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pulmonary function test, Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale, FEV(1), and TLC data were collected for each patient. RESULTS: We identified a stronger correlation between FEV(1) (r = 0.25, P < .001) vs TLC (r = 0.15, P < .001) when related to the degree of dyspnea as measured with the Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study suggest that compared with TLC, FEV(1) may provide a more accurate measure of restrictive lung disease severity. Further research should look for more accurate measures of patient dyspnea in restrictive lung disease.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。