Abstract
OBJECTIVE: General or single-shut spinal anesthesia (SA) is applied for cesarean section and both methods of anesthesia have different effects on the mother and newborn. This retrospective study, in which 1-year data were analyzed, was aimed to examine the effects of general or SA on maternal and neonatal outcomes. METHODS: Anesthesia technique, mother's age, gestational age, number of pregnancies, previous cesarean delivery number, maternal complications, and indications for cesarean delivery were analyzed in 883 cesarean deliveries. In addition, weight and Apgar scores of newborn and umbilical cord blood gas values were examined. RESULTS: Neonatal intensive care need was higher in the general anesthesia (GA) group, Apgar scores were higher in the SA group, but neonatal mortality was similar. The umbilical cord Ph and lactate were lower; PCO(2) values were higher in the GA group. Neonatal weight, mother's age, gestational age, and Apgar scores were predictive for neonatal mortality, but anesthesia technique was not. CONCLUSION: While umbilical cord blood gas values were less affected and the need for neonatal intensive care was lower with SA, we believe that both anesthesia methods can be used safely for mother and neonatal in cesarean anesthesia considering maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.