Abstract
To compare the efficacy and advantages of mini percutaneous nephrostomy (MPCN), micropercutaneous nephrostomy (MicroPCN), and retrograde ureteric stenting (RUS) in the treatment of acute upper urinary tract calculi (UUTC) obstruction with hydronephrosis and infection, and verify the safety and indications of clinical application of micropercutaneous nephrostomy. Clinical-epidemiological data of patients with acute upper urinary tract calculi obstruction and infection treated in Ningbo No.2 hospital were retrospectively collected from May 2019 to May 2023. 64 patients (20 patients in MPCN group, 13 patients in MicroPCN group, and 31 patients in RUS group) were eligible for analysis based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. There were no significant differences in peri-intervention temperature, multiple infection indicators and complications among the three groups. The nutritional status and peri-intervention coagulation function of patients in MicroPCN and RUS groups were poor, the CRP and proportion of using carbapenem advanced antibiotics were higher. The length of hospital stay and the length of hospital stay after the intervention in MPCN and MicroPCN groups were longer, the length and width of calculi were larger, and the degree of hydronephrosis was heavier. Patients in the MicroPCN group had the worst general condition, the lowest hemoglobin before intervention, the longest withdrawal time of vasoactive drugs. MPCN, MicroPCN, and RUS are safe and effective in relieving acute upper urinary tract calculi obstruction complicated with infection. MicroPCN has more advantages for patients with critical illness or complex obstruction urinary lithiasis.