Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) has become a major public health concern globally. Mutations in first- and second-line drug targets such as katG, inhA, rpoB, rrs, eis, gyrA, and gyrB have been associated with drug resistance. Monitoring predominant mutations in the MDR-TB patient population is essential to monitor and devise future therapeutic regimes. The present study is aimed to characterize genetic mutations in MDR isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) bacilli conferring resistance to a second-line anti-tuberculosis drug in the Eastern Indian population. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Microbiology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, and in the Tuberculosis Demonstration & Training Centre, Agamkuan, Patna. A total of 3270 patients suspected to have MDR-TB were recruited in the study. Two sputum samples, one on the spot, and the other in the morning were collected from each patient and the diagnosis of rifampicin-sensitive (RS)/rifampicin-resistant (RR/MDR) TB was done by Gene-Xpert test. One hundred fifty RS-TB samples and 150 RR/MDR-TB samples were considered for line probe assay (LPA). RS samples were subjected to first-line LPA using Genotype(®) MTBDR Plus ver 2.0 and RR/MDR samples were considered for second-line LPA using Genotype(® )MTBDRsl ver 2.0. All sputum samples were subjected to sputum smear microscopy using the Ziehl-Neelsen staining method. Statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0 (IBM Corp. Armonk, NY) and R (version 4.1; R Core Team 2021). RESULTS: In the present study, out of 3270 patients, we detected RR/MDR-TB in 235 patients (7.19%), RS-TB in 812 patients (24.83%), the rest of the patients negative for MTB (2223, 67.98%). Out of 150 RR/MDR-TB sputum samples tested, resistance to fluoroquinolone (FQ) was observed in 41 samples. The selected patients had predominantly FQ resistance due to the gyrA gene mutations (97.56%, n=40) compared to the gyrB gene mutations (2.44%, n=1). We observed >60% of the mutations in the gyrA gene in codon 94 (MUT3C (D94G), MUT3A (D94A), and MUT3D (D94H). In addition, we found the mutations MUT1 (A90V) and MUT2 (S91P) in the codons 90 and 91 of the gyrA gene in the considered MTB patient population. CONCLUSION: The identified genes can be further validated to be considered as therapeutic targets, but more therapeutics and advanced strategies should be applied in the management of MTB.