Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip affects millions of people with a sizable health-related economic burden. Conventional treatment modalities are prioritized, turning to surgical intervention only when they have failed. Nevertheless, these approaches have flaws, regularly trying to provide symptomatic pain relief instead of focusing on the underlying etiology. The last two decades have seen a significant increase in the use of autologous peripheral blood-derived orthobiologics (APBOs) for managing musculoskeletal disorders, including OA of the hip. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is the most regularly used APBO. Yet, studies have shown its inefficacy in improving pain and function along with a high incidence of reporting bias in systematic reviews and meta-analyses involving PRP injections for hip OA. Thus, the potential of using other APBOs, including platelet lysate (PL), autologous conditioned serum (ACS), gold-induced cytokine (GOLDIC), plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF), autologous protein solution (APS), and hyperacute serum (HS), for managing OA of the hip was investigated. This review summarizes the results of clinical studies involving the mentioned APBOs to manage OA of the hip. Multiple databases (Scopus, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science) were searched employing terms for these 'APBOs' and 'OA of the hip' for articles published in the English language till September 21, 2024, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Only two articles fit the scope of our study, and both included articles involved the use of ACS. No clinical studies involving the use of PL, GOLDIC, PRGF, APS, and HS were identified. No ongoing clinical trials were listed on any of the searched registers involving the use of the aforesaid APBOs. Intra-articular administration of ACS is safe and can reduce pain in patients with OA of the hip. Nonetheless, given the dearth of pertinent literature and limitations of included articles, more adequately powered, prospective, multicenter, controlled, open-label or blinded, randomized, and non-randomized trials with extended follow-up are necessary to determine the efficacy of various APBOs for managing hip OA. Further comparative studies to assist clinicians in finding the ideal APBO for the treatment of OA of the hip are needed.