Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel biomaterial (FG) for alveolar ridge preservation compared to CTG in terms of soft tissue thickness and bone dimensional changes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted on 30 patients who required extraction of 30 hopeless mandibular posterior teeth. All patients went through atraumatic tooth extraction, and then, they were randomly allocated to either a CTG, an FG, or a spontaneous healing (SH) group (1:1:1). All patients received a dental implant placed 6 months postoperatively. The soft tissue thickness and bone dimensional changes were measured before and 6 months after the procedure. RESULTS: The study's analysis revealed statistically significant differences in buccal gingival thickness and dimensional bone changes across the three examined groups after 6 months (p < 0.05). The SH group had lower gingival thickness (1.31 ± 0.65 mm) and higher vertical resorption (-1.46 ± 1.67 mm at the buccal aspect) compared with the CTG and FG groups. The CTG and FG groups had similar gingival thickness (2.42 ± 0.70 and 3.00 ± 0.71 mm, respectively) and bone width reduction (+0.86 ± 2.31 and +0.93 ± 2.38 mm, respectively), whereas the CTG group had lower vertical bone loss (-0.30 ± 1.09 mm at the buccal aspect) than the FG group (-0.47 ± 2.30 mm at the buccal aspect). CONCLUSION: FG and CTG demonstrate equivalent soft tissue thickness and comparable horizontal bone dimension outcomes in ARP.